|
Soul mate
relationships
appear at
first glance to be the ideal type of relationship, but ultimately, as
we clear away our self deceptions, we discover that that was an
illusion, and the reality that is thus uncovered is much more
liberating and
conducive to true happiness.
|
If
you
want to print this page, you can save precious resources by reducing
the print size first.
In Firefox you do this in Print Preview, and in Internet Explorer you do it by going to View > Text size and choosing a smaller size. |
![]()
Important!
In order to fully understand the contents of this and many other pages on this site it is necessary to carefully read Exit 'Spirituality' - Enter Clear-Mindedness, which provides essential background information.
This article, apart from the final section, is now significantly out of date, containing some distorted notions regarding soul mate relationships, which I've now straightened out, as I indicate in the final section. I have chosen to retain this page for the time being, but I do caution that if you read only part way through you may get a somewhat distorted notion of what I'm really seeking to put across, although I was getting towards pointing in the right direction. I advise here therefore about the necessity to read on to the end of this page in order to ensure that you get a clear view.
A plus side of my keeping it this way is that many people will initially relate more easily to my earlier still rather distorted notions on the subject of soul mates, and then would make more sense of my current, clearer viewpoint - seeing more clearly "where I'm coming from", so to speak.
The following notes are not intended to be a lecture to people as to how they should live their lives, but are included as an encouragement and inspiration to anyone who senses that there is something inadequate about the close human relationships that are recognised in our cultures. This is a small part of my personal programme of helping to generate and cultivate the reality in which I want to live. We all have the power to do this, if only we'd give up our negative and restrictive beliefs about ourselves.
On the physical level it would appear that I myself can claim no expertise on the subject of close relationships, having had no significant close relationship so far in this lifetime. I am, however, an explorer, who is getting inspired and relieved at what he's finding through sweeping away all preconceptions and uncovering the reality that our cultures and religions train us to deny. My own discoveries are of nothing new; many deeply aware people have found these things before and indeed find them today. However, what they have missed is the fact that the actual practice of those ideals falls far short of the intellectual understandings that they have gained. My special interest here is in moving beyond that intellectual understanding and actually putting it all into practice in everyday life, so that we can let go of our needless limitations based upon gender and sexual orientations and preferences, and instead we can open up fully to each other as fully loving companions regardless of how briefly and at what level we interact.
I am therefore putting these ideas out again in my particular way in the hope that they will touch people who have not been touched by them before. And yes, I do realize that my writings on this subject will probably stir up some negative and highly critical responses. At least if I do get that I can be well assured that I've done something right!
One point I want to make here is that prior to its revision in May 2007, with an update in December that year (the important final section), this article contained what I now recognise clearly as distortions which had got in because I was being 'guided' off-course by the dark force posing as my higher consciousness and other high sources. I was thus making a lot of the notion that supposedly we'd become very ready to get erotic with each other when we are enlightened and getting deeply self realized. This was actually a story being given to me by the dark force, which latter was seeking to get me very preoccupied with eroticism and to get me disseminating this distortion, so causing problems for others and of course also getting myself discredited.
While I certainly want to counter the rarefaction of personal relationships that is in some quarters associated with being enlightened, I also have to say that now that I'm not accepting any channelled 'information' (i.e. stories) at all because all channelled information gets at least some distortion sourced from 'the dark side', I see the correct way forward as being the way of a completely open mind about how one's relationships or potential for them would develop as one's self realization deepens.
Yes, we would become free from inhibiting patterns and fears that currently restrict or prevent many relationships and very positive, healing interactions between people, but also we would be free from desire and attachment, and many other changes would occur in our emotional and 'energy' make-up, so that it's not possible really to know what truly enlightened life would be like. It's thus best to live in the present, not assuming anything (nor believing anyone's teachings) about how we'd function in the future, because the future is only speculation; only the present - the 'now' - is what we really have. No teachings, from any source, can fully reflect 'What Is'; only 'What Is' itself can do that!
However, we can use energy testing and cultivate direct grounded energy awareness (something different from ungrounded or 'psychic' energy awareness) to find out at any time what is the healthiest choice for us to make - so we do not need to be left in the dark about what is truly appropriate for ourselves. This way, we as individuals find out what is uniquely right for 'me' instead of somebody laying down a rule saying that everyone needs to live or should be living in a particular way. So, I myself don't have to lay down for anyone in any detail how their relationships with other people need to be, because, with energy testing, they can find out what's best for themselves at any particular time. My task, therefore, is only in giving some generalized principles and pointers and encouraging people then to get off and find their own individual best way, bearing in mind my various cautions and caveats.
Love is the way we naturally feel about ourselves and each other, when all emotional traumas and painful emotions are out of the way. However, the almost universal situation is that we have stored memories of painful situations such as loneliness. isolation and insecurity, which become restimulated the moment we experience the feelings of personal love, so that this becomes buried under something else which then takes over.
So, the fact still goes widely unrecognised that when we feel
that
we want a close relationship, or want to hold on to one, much of the
driving force is not actually our love, but unacknowledged feelings of
loneliness and insecurity that spring from probably forgotten events in
our childhood, and also experiences that are
not of this lifetime*. This doesn't mean that
we don't feel love too, but it routinely gets hijacked by our
compulsions. Because we are conditioned to act out of our loneliness
and insecurity rather than allow ourselves to feel and release those
painful emotions, we imagine that the desire and compulsions that we
feel towards others, whether or not including the sexual element, are
love.
* According to many, these would be experiences in one's previous lifetimes, but to my current understanding, for many people all or at least the vast majority of such issues and memories are those of parasitic lost souls attached to those people. Thus in practice you are affected by experiences and memories that are from previous lifetimes - but quite likely most or all of them not your own.
For example, until at least late 2007, when I got intimations that I'd finally cleared them out (but I'm not sure how correct that indication really was), I myself had an exceptional load of parasitic lost souls attached to me, which caused me quite a major problem, as I recount in The Dark Force ('Astral Entities') - My Own Tough Experiences, and indeed I was carrying extremely little emotional trauma material that was truly my own (just from my childhood in this lifetime, as I'd had no previous soul incarnations, apparently being a no-soul incarnation).
The reality is that if you systematically allow yourself to feel and release those various painful emotions such as loneliness, your love shines ever brighter, and it eventually becomes shorn of desire and clinging, and sexual arousal occurs under your direction in appropriate circumstances instead of coming up unbidden in all sorts of inappropriate circumstances and driving you wild with desire. The love energy itself, shorn of the compulsions, glows - even shines - on the one hand like an outgoing radiation which excludes no-one, and on the other, as a beam of splendour that shines upon a partner or lover in a way that envelopes the two people in a most beautiful and powerful mutually uplifting and healing resonance. How different all this is from what is called love in most close relationships, which involves to a considerable degree shutting everyone else out and stunting each other's opening-out and self realization process into the bargain!
Most of the time, in our relationships we are seeking to make ourselves feel comfortable and good, rather than giving our full attention to the other person and considering his/her needs. If you think you love a person because (s)he is one way or another, then that is not pure love but a desire of yours to be comforted by the particular way the particular person is or probably looks. You would find it difficult to allow or encourage that person to change from that way, even if it's what (s)he really needs. Similarly your partner would reckon (s)he loves you because of the way you are, and would resist any change affecting that. Such mutual restrictiveness is what I see going on in most marriage and similar relationships. This sort of restrictiveness in relationships, where perceived needs are attempting to be fulfilled to the advantage of neither partner, is what we commonly refer to as a codependent relationship.
One good indicator of how much the 'love' in a relationship - and indeed the relationship itself - is off the rails is, to what extent the relationship is based on a sense of need. If even one partner is 'loving' or otherwise entangled in a relationship on the basis of need, then that is not what is meant by love in any deeply aware and human way, and thus it isn't compatible with any genuine self realization process, but instead it is just the gratification of one's own wish-fulfilment urges without regard to the true needs of the other person.
How many people have you encountered who claim that sex is a
need
(and usually they 'need' quite a bit of it)? Or who brag, discreetly or
volubly, that they are satisfying such a 'need' - even perhaps calling
it an appetite? Perhaps you are one of
them, in which case you may find the following note to be uncomfortable
or infuriating reading.
The truth is that unbidden sexual arousals, and hankering after sex, are the product of emotional hurts from early in our lives and, particularly importantly, from extraneous sources such as previous lifetimes or attached entities or thought forms, and are NOT our natural sex drive. Virtually all of us carry these interfering emotional energies and the behaviour patterns that they cause, but most people, particularly in the area of anything to do with sex, prefer to live in denial of the underlying cause of their feelings, hanging onto the compulsive desires and behaviour, defending them as though their whole identity and indeed existence depended on them. Typically they will insist that their own sexual feelings are 'normal' or 'natural sex drive' and anything different is unnatural or abnormal (and therefore implicitly bad).
The truth of my assertion was brought home to me when I was active in the Re-evaluation Counselling community, and learnt that a small but steadily increasing number of people had used the procedures of Re-evaluation Counselling to release and heal all their emotional hurts and tensions relating to sex and sexuality. I learnt that in every case where people had fully worked through and released such material they no longer had sexual arousals coming up unbidden, and neither did they have sexual arousals when they weren't in a situation of physical closeness and it was clearly not appropriate to do so. In appropriate situations, however, they could choose, with full command of theirselves, in a relaxed way and with the agreement of the partner, to allow arousal and consummation to occur, and this could then be a truly magnificent experience. I can vouch for this challenging scenario on the basis of the remarkable changes that have occurred within me relating to my sexual feelings as I've continued to clear out the old emotional issues and dark force interferences.
So, what are these hurt feelings that we hang on to and which
manifest as sexual desires? Among the various loneliness and insecurity
issues mentioned previously, more precisely we should look at early
deprivation of aware, warm physical contact,
especially in
our first few years of life*. Virtually none of us had
enough of
that
when we were very young, and at that stage, when we were so emotionally
vulnerable, it was a real, present-time need. Undoubtedly some
parents manage to give a lot of warm and loving contact, but in few
cases indeed is even the most loving, caring parent sufficiently deeply
aware and clear of their own emotional hurts to give sufficient
closeness and contact, and of sufficient quality, to prevent some of
these deprivation hurts from occurring. The occurrence of such hurts
wouldn't be any great problem, if only the parents also had sufficient
understanding and awareness to encourage the child's natural emotional
healing processes - particularly crying, trembling, laughing and bright
angry tantrums.
* Actually that is only part of it, for often and probably generally there is a bigger underlying factor of various separation traumas prior the present lifetime. These may include actual past life experiences of one's own, but very commonly belong mostly or entirely to parasitic lost souls that are attached to one.
Because full healing is rarely allowed, the child accumulates more and more of these deprivation hurts, the old ones actually getting restimulated every time some new situation - even an intrinsically unhurtful one - reminds it of a previous situation which was experienced as hurtful. When this happens, the new situation also is experienced as a hurtful one, and once again full release of the feelings isn't allowed, so that the growing child becomes more and more disposed to experience that feeling of deprivation in many or all areas of her life. When sexual feelings start to occur, they are at once hijacked by the dark force, which interferes with everyone (whether directly or via programming held in the soul), which combines a measured quantity of painful emotion - particularly fear - into the sexual feelings in order to give them a strongly compelling and addictive quality that they would not have otherwise.
In this way the feeling of a deep need for warm and aware physical contact becomes ingrained in the system, and all tied up and confused with sexual feelings that have been made addictive by the dark force interference, even though during the growing-up process the original need for such a high level of physical closeness has fallen away because as we grow up we understand the world around us (well, to a point!) and, at least theoretically, don't any longer need all that very close contact to convince us that our surroundings are safe. You could call this feeling of need a 'frozen need', in the sense that it is all the feelings of an early need and deprivation, just lodged there, stuck in the mind, pretending that it's still a current need. But because it's just stuck there as a repetitive pattern of feeling, to get close contact now doesn't meet the need because there is no such need at all at the present time! That is part of the reason why so many of us have constantly felt the need for more and more, or again and again, when it comes to sex - though the primary reason is the dark force interference that is always seeking to cultivate attachment and addiction. Gratifying the feelings doesn't clear the perceived need, nor the dark force interference, so we continue to feel the desire for 'it'. In fact our true natural sex 'drive' (which is not a drive at all in fact) and sexuality has been hidden from us by all these compulsive feelings.
The good news is that it is possible to release ourselves from these compulsions and reclaim our wonderful, relaxed non-compulsive, non-addictive natural sexuality - which is not at all like the 'drive' that most of us experience. Read on...
A conspiracy of circumstances caused me even in early childhood to wall myself around to avoid close relationships of the sorts I could see around me. I longed for a degree of shared awareness, acceptance, openness and total trust that seemed to me so simple and natural, yet was not in evidence in people's relationships around me. Everyone was manipulating each other, playing all manner of role-play games, mostly quite unaware of what they were doing. I myself was tormented by longings that made my own loneliness particularly difficult to bear, and it took me many years to work through my confusions - not helped by the fact that I had no contact at all for my first 30 years with any model or description of what in my mind's eye would constitute a healthy and fully nurturing relationship. At first it seemed to me that some spouse-type relationships theoretically could be such, but I didn't observe this working out in practice, even though many people around me blandly accepted the limitations of the relationships they got into and thus could claim that they were living happy lives. You don't miss what you're not aware of.
It's an old and ubiquitous trick, to shut down your self-awareness to whatever level hides most of your discomforts, so that you can then seem to be more or less satisfied with life. Healers have an apt term for that behaviour - living in denial. One trouble about living that way is that you unwittingly water down your positive experiences as well as negative ones, so the 'happiness' of living in denial bears no comparison with the deep contentment, wonder, joy and sense of loving power (not power over other people!) that can be opened up by facing and releasing all the painful emotions and limitations.
On the extremely rare occasions I mentioned to anyone what I
really
wanted in a relationship I was at once criticized for being naive,
unrealistic, idealistic (using the latter as a term of abuse
- the
fools!)
,
and out of touch with the 'real' world.
It was in the 1970's, when I took up Re-evaluation Counselling, that I learnt about how hidden painful emotions distort all 'normal' relationships and hide the real nature of love, which latter is the way we would naturally feel about each other without exception if we released all our painful emotions. But then, when in 1997 I recognised the innermost nature of my consciousness (crossed the threshold of enlightenment), I perceived directly that love was in fact not something you do at all.
"What?"
Double take! Yes, I found that true love isn't something you do. I hereby declare the verb 'to love' redundant!
"You're nuts!"
Of course this monkey is deliberately being provocative, but nonetheless he's making a serious point. If I told you I love you, in a sense it would be true - truer probably than anything you'd dare imagine! But yet it's also a nonsensical statement. What I discovered was that I am love. That is, love is my true nature. This love is an 'energy' that shines upon all without fear or favour. Lest that sound like a megalomaniac's boast, let's quickly add that the same is true for you. Your true nature is love. Loving isn't something we do, because love is an intrinsic aspect of us anyway. How can you 'do' what you simply are - any more than you could talk of a tree treeing? What we are doing, indeed most or all of the time, is hiding or at least distorting our love, our true nature, because we've forgotten who and what we truly are! When we are being truly loving, it's because we're temporarily trying less hard to stifle it!
You'd be astounded if you perceived all the work and energy you've been habitually expending - indulging in fantastic feats of complexity - to hide and stifle the radiance and healing and inspiring qualities of the love that is your true nature. If you were not doing all that you could easily actually a distinct advance over Jesus, Buddha or other great people who were supposedly open manifestations of universal love, because even those people were all displaying evidence of distortions of their own awareness and manifestation of love, thanks to the dark force interference that each of them was getting.
How, then, can we learn to stop doing all this that gets in the way of our true nature manifesting? In fact there are many ways, but for me undoubtedly the most powerful methods are those that I present in Healing and Self Actualization - The Safest and Quickest Way. If these or other suitable methods are used thoroughly, then all those compulsive patterns relating to closeness and sexual feelings will progressively weaken and eventually dissolve, leaving us free.
I find that, now that my own life is belatedly opening up to close relationships, the very concept of 'I love you', with all its connotations of exclusivity and very likely desire and possessiveness, is abandoned in favour of simply opening to the wonderful experiences of closeness, however simple and transient it may be on the physical plane. The only words I can find to replace 'I love you' are expressions such as 'Wow, this is beautiful!' - but essentially the experience of a deep loving resonance between two energy-compatible people is totally beyond words or even worldly concepts. Without desire and clinging, it's the easiest thing in the world to accept not only the beauty and power of aware closeness but also to accept each other's free will to develop and change, and for any close friend or partner to move away, developing in different directions. This way, the present cannot be clouded by hurt feelings nor emotional after-tastes from what is past; there can be no significant 'separation blues', and jealousy is meaningless.
So, you think that at least your own close and exclusive relationship is based on healthy and pure love? Well, then, in your mind's eye just try separating, or have your partner involved in an additional close relationship, or become stronger, more upright and independent, and see how you feel then! That's when you come face to face with the feelings that have caused all that clinging and exclusiveness, and you then have a golden opportunity to recognise those feelings for what they are and start releasing them, so that future relationships can be freer and more aware.
One important guideline to use when reviewing what you imagine to be your love for another person is, to consider carefully to what extent you are seeking to bend the will of that person to meet your desires. If you are doing that at all, you are not in the healthiest possible relationship, and genuine love (which always respects other people's freedom) has been consigned to the back burner. If you are already in a close relationship with the person, consider carefully - are you at ease with that person changing according to his / her needs? Indeed - more to the point - are you positively supportive to such changes in the other person, even if it could mean your both eventually going off in different directions? If you are not, love is not your primary motivation, never mind that your feelings are masquerading to you as 'love'. Similarly, if you are seeking a close relationship with a particular person, consider carefully what is going on for you. Are you seeking a close and even physical relationship with that person regardless of what his / her wishes and needs are? Indeed, are you actually intruding on that person's space and right of self-direction by pestering that person with your unsolicited attentions?
This latter phenomenon is a very common compulsion among men towards women, and unfortunately in our deluded culture it is often regarded as chivalrous and even noble to behave in such inconsiderate and unloving ways. Think how many instances there are in our literary and operatic heritage of such behaviour being portrayed as noble and heroic! The 'chivalrous' man keeps pestering some frightened and insecure woman with gifts and 'love' messages that simply frighten her more and deny her personal stature and dignity. The 'chivalrous' man decides out of his own egotism what he thinks the woman needs, and of course also 'knows' that he is the answer to those 'needs' that he's decided that she has... And because most women have had patterns of passivity or/and diffidence towards men's advances ingrained into them during their upbringing, the chivalrous man will take any diffidence or uncertainty in a woman's rejections of his advances as an invitation to continue his pressure upon her, with the aim of 'conquering' her...
Conversely, the kindest thing the woman could do in such circumstances would be not to be 'a nice little girl' and let the man continue like that, but instead to stand her full height and say a firm NO!, in thought, word and deed. If her suitor doesn't take 'No!' for an answer she may need to give up any allegiance to the 'niceness' that she was taught in her childhood and show a hard edge (responsibly!) toward him.
It's not my intent simplistically to paint men as the 'baddies' and women as the 'goodies', for all manner of manipulative role-play games can occur one way or the other between the genders. A favourite women's ploy is to pester and burden the man of her desire with acts of helplessness, or / and to keep presenting herself to him when dressed and made-up in such a fashion as to arouse his desires. It's a bit disingenuous of her then to complain of unwanted attentions when at least part of the answer is in her own hands!
To these deluded people my message is clear. The way out is to STOP and give yourself time and space to look deep within yourself where the root of your compulsive feelings lies. There you will find pain. You will find loneliness. Take courage and feel it! You can release these hurts through the natural release processes of crying, trembling, laughter, etc, but this could take a long time to clear everything, so the best way is to use one or more fast-track emotional clearance methods, such as I present in Healing and Self Actualization - The Safest and Quickest Way. In this manner you get progressively recovering your true humanity, clearing out dark force interference, and become clearer in thought and perception. This way you can become more respectful of another's space and needs - and in so doing, you are uncovering the true, unconditional, love that was hidden by your compulsions before. Are you man (or woman) enough to be that honest with yourself?
This section has now been moved and adapted to be read as a separate page - Hugging Is For Everybody.
It was really when I started involving myself in spiritual healing* late in 1998 that I found that the ideal close relationship that I'd always longed for in my heart of hearts was recognised by many people on 'spiritual paths', and particularly healers, who would use the expression 'soul mate' rather than 'partner' or any of the other familiar terms. Just to confuse us all, there is also a common loose usage of the term, simply to mean an ultra-compatible partner in a conventional sense, with whom one could supposedly live happily ever after in a stultifying state of attachment. That is emphatically not what I was concerned with. No doubt different people would have their own idea of what would constitute a soul mate relationship in my sense of the term, but in my view when I originally wrote this article it had the following characteristics, as described in my rather confused understanding at that time. I've added some more recent comments in square brackets.
* Yes, and that eventually proved to be one BIG problem for me! What I didn't know then was that all those healing traditions are distorted by dark force permeation, and the very concept of 'soul mates' was sourced from the dark force for the purpose of further cultivating attachment and keeping people firmly directed away from genuine self realization, which is always blocked by attachment. Also, the very notion of 'spirituality' or 'being spiritual' is sourced from the dark force for the same general reason, as explained in Exit Spirituality - Enter Clear-Mindedness, as is the extremely limiting notion of a 'bond of love' between two people. Genuine love has nothing to do with bonds between anyone. So, the following list is actually something of a museum piece, actually including my confusions of that period before I came to recognise and start filtering out all my dark force sourced confusions.
![]()
There is a deep energy resonance and 'spiritual' understanding between the two parties, whether or not they think of it as 'spirituality', and a commitment to allow and even actively encourage 'spiritual growth' [i.e. really self realization, and nothing to do with 'spirituality'], which implies accepting broadening horizons and personal change, even where this may result in the two parties moving apart.
A deep and permanent bond of love has been formed, no matter whether there is much physical manifestation of this, and this persists even when the soul mates develop in different directions and perhaps never see each other again in the present lifetime; the bond remains and transcends individual lifetimes, so that the soul mates are particularly liable to meet again and again in different incarnations and very likely in the spirit world too in-between times.
Actually usually such a bond has existed over many lifetimes, so nearly all our soul mates are really defined by such a connection with oneself, even if we never actually meet in the current lifetime.
As part of the commitment to each other's and one's own spiritual growth [again, this really should be self realization, and nothing to do with 'spirituality'], there is no exclusiveness or attachment to each other; closeness is enjoyed to the full when it happens, but it is let go of with equanimity when it's no longer appropriate - and there's no limit, apart from plain practicalities, to the number of soul mates that one could have. However, anyone who is philandering, jumping into bed with a whole succession of people, would be deluding himself if he thought he was a soul mate for them, as that's not how love works when it is free of compulsive behaviour. I should say that even among people who understand the true nature of soul mate relationships it is common if not normal to assume that a person would have only one soul mate, but that doesn't make sense to me, and smacks of relics of the old restrictive view of attached, exclusive relationships.
True, it may not be practical for me to live physically closely in an ongoing fashion with more than one such person at a time, but I see that as only a superficial physical limitation and not a restriction on the degree of closeness that can develop with other friends and companions. Perhaps the problem here is more in labelling individuals as 'soul mate' rather than simply loving anyone in that sublime way as the most simple and natural way to be. It may be, too, that the ability to be fully unrestricted in manifesting the true, spiritual love [A misnomer again - genuine love isn't 'spiritual', but simply is.], doesn't come to us without our recognising and beginning to manifest our innermost nature - effectively crossing the threshold of enlightenment - for when that happens you perceive directly that you are limitless universal love, so it is no drain on your resources to manifest that level of love all the time.
There is no expectation or specification of what shape or outward appearance the relationship should take, apart from pure love being the kingpin and requiring total honesty and openness. A soul mate relationship can outwardly be at any level of closeness, regardless of age or gender (though bearing in mind physical practicalities and some ethical considerations which would be directed by the core of pure love - pure love considers and acts upon the needs of others, rather than grasping for oneself). Supposedly being soul mates would not normally be a valid reason for an adult to have sex with a child, for example, because the adult in such circumstances would in almost all cases not be thinking clearly about responsibility towards the youngster's true needs and the long-term effects of doing that; for this reason sexual relationships between adults and children could virtually never be regarded as healthy or appropriate, whether or not there were soul mate connections between the particular adult and child.
Such a bond can exist between people who would appear only to be distant acquaintances in a particular lifetime, but it has no limits in the degree of closeness attainable in appropriate circumstances - the latter involving anything from brief simple contacts to consummation in physical lovemaking. In the case of brief simple physical contacts, the connection at the non-physical levels would still be strong and constant. Because the bond, once formed, is at a level that transcends individual lifetimes, it places no restrictions upon gender. Gender is something which we have temporarily during each incarnation.
When fully developed, because the relationship is one of mutual opening up of awareness and healing, it is a beacon of light for other people, giving them healing and inspiration too - we are all interconnected at the 'spiritual' level. [No, we're not - any 'spiritual' level is illusory and where we're captives of the dark force. Where we are all interconnected is in the deepest levels of consciousness.] So it's not just a gift for a lucky couple but a supreme gift to humanity. [No it isn't! It's not a gift at all. Like a nose, it simply is!]
![]()
I now have a significantly different view of the situation, because I have let go of the distorted notions that have tended to get associated with healing and indeed the whole so-called New Age movement. I had got things right in many important respects, but had also taken on board the odd highly problematical distortions that are widely being cultivated in people by the dark force.
For one thing, I recognise now that not everyone reincarnates and has past life connections with people in the way that channelled information generally claims, for there is a serious problem about ALL channelled information, as I point out in Better Without Channelling. So, the notion of a permanent connection or bond having been formed, which would keep bringing you together with a supposed soul mate in different lifetimes is applicable only to some people, and indeed in those cases it is nothing positive and is actually a trap set up by the dark force to keep the person away from true self realization and thus real freedom (see further below). Undoubtedly there are particular people with whom one feels very distinct energy resonances and in some cases who one seems to recognise from a long time ago, even though it is a first encounter in this lifetime, but there are other possible explanations for what appear to be past life memories or connections, so it's most helpful to keep a very open mind on the subject and not surround it with unverifiable 'story'.
Indeed, my current understanding is that all relationship chakra cords - energy connections that link people who are or have been close in some way - are inappropriate and need dissolving, because they reflect attachment. Indeed, my current indications is that they are actually illusory in the first place, and are just a bit of 'story' given by the dark force to healers and some psychics to help reinforce the supposed validity of particular attached relationships. Truly healthy relationships, however deep and fundamental, would be completely free of such attachment. From this perspective, the New-Age-type view of soul mate connections looks to be one of the many parts of the highly problematical, dark-force sourced illusory realities that are being cultivated in the New Age movement.
A particular New Age concept is the so-called twin flame, who is somebody with whom one purportedly has a unique soul connection, and with whom one is destined to come together at some very advanced stage of one's evolution. That, then, goes beyond the normal notion of a soul mate; you could call the twin flame the ultimate soul mate, perhaps. However, I see this whole notion again as being part of the illusory realities that the dark force is seeking to lure us into, via channellings from invented and indeed illusory higher beings such as the purported ascended masters and archangels.
That twin flame scenario exploits our weaknesses, for nearly all of us carry at least some level of emotional issue causing us to long for 'the ultimate' close, happily-ever-after (i.e. extremely attached and almost certainly exclusive and thus extremely limiting and stultifying) relationship with one person. All that diverts people from living fully in the present and being fully in harmony with 'What Is' - which is the true way to become enlightened or deepen your realization, and experience interactions and relationships with other people that are altogether healthy.
Actually, what the dark force is doing in cultivating the notion of the twin flame is just what advertisers of products do when in their advertisements they seek to associate the particular products with something or somebody supposedly 'ideal', such as a slick and glamorous-looking, heavily (I would say disgustingly) made-up woman or a couple in a romantic or implicitly erotic situation, or a scene depicting a supposedly ideal lifestyle in which all 'wants' are immediately satisfied (presumably by spending money) - 100% consumerist and 'appropriate' with not a hint of aware, authentic living. That sort of conduct is often euphemistically described as 'selling a dream'. Indeed, it is the dark force that has programmed and controlled people into putting out such dishonest advertising in the first place, and the twin flame is one of its multitude of dishonest 'advertising' ploys - indeed selling a most pernicious 'dream'.
Some people experience strong and often persistent erotic feelings and/or sexual arousals relating to a particular person and thus believe, or wonder if, that person is their soul mate or twin flame. The 'sad and sorry' explanation is quite a come-down, for what is happening in pretty well every such case is that the dark force is attacking with the feelings of sexual arousal or erotic ecstasy in order to get one into an unhealthy, attached relationship with that person (or at least tormented by unrequited longings for him/her), with whom one may or may not have a true and deep compatibility but with whom there is NO actual predestination to come together, except as engineered by the dark force for highly problematical reasons.
In fact the notions of both soul mate and twin flame have been given to us from the dark force for one very specific reason (in addition to any others) - and that is to divert us from cultivating and opening up our one most important relationship of all - with ourselves! That is, with our own deepest aspects, which are based in 'the Ultimate'. If you have any 'twin flame' at all, it is yourself!
The 'twin flame' concept is in fact an externalization of that relationship with ourselves (and thus 'the Ultimate'), with the aim of getting us to look anywhere but the right place to find that deepest and most fundamental harmony. It is thus another aspect of the same phenomenon as the externalization of fundamental consciousness (our deepest aspect or level of consciousness) into some external presence or 'God', in order to turn us away from enlightenment and genuine self realization.
When you are fully and deeply in love and harmony with yourself you love other people and indeed the whole life experience most healthily, and then the whole notion of soul mate and especially twin flame is meaningless. You simply recognise those people with whom you are in energy terms most compatible for any sort of close friendship or companionship, but do not actually need such relationships, even though for virtually all people some such relationships would be highly beneficial (provided that they don't become based on attachment and exclusivity).
To most people the notion of actually living an enlightened life and having enlightened relationships with people appears to be a far-off ideal. It is in fact realizable, though it does require some work on the individual's part. However, that work is in itself joyful and brings about a progressive increase in health and happiness, so that you get a much more balanced outlook that is not constrained or preoccupied with any longing or craving for any particular type of relationship.
So, how then to go about achieving that surely ideal state? -- Simple! As good a starting point as any is The Guide to Complete Self Actualization - assuming you follow the links through for the various methods and practices and don't rely on the affirmations alone.
If you want to establish whether forming any specific sort of
relationship with a particular person would be truly in your best
interests at the present time, then the 'cool' and effective way to do
this is by energy
testing - the only problem being that the vast majority of
people are too programmed (yes, by the dark force again!) to be able to
find their own real truth by energy testing, for their deeply ingrained
preconceived notions would simply direct the results and completely
obscure any genuine answers that were seeking to come from their
deepest aspects. However, probably the vast majority of people who'd
read this page would be amenable to effective energy testing, provided
they observe the various cautions and caveats that I give in my
instructions for using it.
Warning! Ordinary dowsing, channelling, asking a medium or clairvoyant, or divining of any kind (including but not limited to Tarot, I Ching, palmistry, astrology, numerology angel cards or runes) aligns you immediately with the dark force, and any 'information' gained from such sources, however plausible or convincing it may appear, WILL contain distortions specifically aimed to lead you away from what is in your best interests. I say this not out of belief but out of hard personal experience and aware observations of what is going on for others. The dark force is unscrupulous and unremitting in its trying to get people into inappropriate and unhealthy relationships to an extent that is beyond most people's wildest imagination. Forewarned is forearmed!
Now we can altogether drop the weary notion of the soul mate,
and
the so-called twin flame too, and breathe one mighty sigh of relief -
and then really get living! ![]()

Are you a person of exceptional
depth and authenticity
who's got what this
Group takes?
Copyright,
2002
with
revisions and additions to 2007, by Philip Goddard. All
rights
reserved.
You are welcome to link to this article, but please do NOT
place copies of it on other websites.