HEALING - SOME MYTHS EXPOSED
by Philip Goddard

In Reiki, the symbols give you superior healing abilities

Myth. 
Reiki, like virtually all spiritual and healing traditions, is a seriously harmful distortion of and sidetrack from Humanity's underlying spontaneous seeking for self realization - enabling one's deepest aspects and core essence to manifest fully in undistorted form through one's Earthly presence.

I'm not saying at all that you don't get 'healing' from Reiki, but I am saying that such healing comes in an unbalanced, distorted form which helps unground you and open your awareness more to the astral sub-reality and the immense problems that it brings with it. The symbols of Reiki, like all healing and sacred symbols (even such revered symbols as the OM and merkaba) were actually channelled to humans by astral ('dark') entities posing as higher beings or unnamed 'higher' sources, for the purpose of helping divert us away from true self realization and into the control of the astral forces, of which I write more in Interference and Attacks From Astral ('Dark') Entities. The great advantage of the Reiki symbols is NOT for the people using them, but for the astral entities seeking control and domination over those people.

Sounds like a hyped-up crazy belief of mine? -- Then just read about my own severe experiences with the astral forces, which latter apparently got quite close to managing to take me over by staging a 'partial walk-in' (which, thankfully, failed as far as I can tell), in Troublesome Astral ('Dark') Entities -- My own experience, and think again - bearing in mind that my involvement in Reiki, including having had all three attunements and been laughably certificated as a so-called Reiki Master, was part of what was progressively ungrounding me and leading up to my severe troubles.

If you have had Reiki healings with use of symbols (which may have been used on you without your knowing of it, because most Reiki healers keep them more or less secret), or especially if you have had one or more Reiki attunements (which put the Reiki symbols in your energy system), then you have distortions in your energy system which would all the time be interfering with your grounding and thus would be keeping you more susceptible and vulnerable to astral entities.

Those distortions are caused and maintained NOT by the symbols themselves remaining in the energy system, but thought-form equivalents of them having been unawarely placed along with the actual symbols. These in turn would steadily dissolve, except that pretty well always astral entities keep them in place, so that, unless active clearance measures are used, such thought forms are virtually permanent for the rest of the person's life, causing accumulating problems which would normally not in any way be recognised as linked to the much earlier placing of the symbols.

You can progressively but quite speedily rectify all such harmful distortions through use of the self realization methodologies which I put forward on this site. An excellent starting point is The Guide to Complete Self Realization, whose set of affirmations, if read regularly (daily for best effectiveness) gives you a really secure and powerful foundation for the clearing of all such negative and distorting influences from every aspect of your entire being, and that page links to others which point you to a range of simple but very powerful methods and measures for self realization and progressive clearance of all foreign energies, entities and influences of any sort.

I give two particular methods for clearing thought forms and energy implants in Some Potent Self Realization / Healing Practices.

Only advanced adepts can project Ki energy for thousands of miles (for healing)

Myth. 
I was amazed to read in some printed material from a Buddhist monastic organization a supposedly impressive claim that their current 'master' can project Ki energy for healing people thousands of miles away. And why was I amazed? Not at that man's great feats of healing, I can assure you, but at the idea expressed there that such an ability is tremendously impressive and pretty well unique to the likes of that particular 'master' and other advanced adepts and quite beyond the capacity of 'ordinary' mortals.

I myself project such energies from here to anyone on Earth. In fact any healer can do that. Any practitioner in the organization in which that 'master' operates could do that if they opened their mind to it. It's what we call distant or remote healing. Why are that 'master' and others like him allowing other people in their religion to remain in such ignorance and lack of their own intrinsic personal power and abundance? (I'm not referring to the 'power' of the ego here but the power and abundance of the enlightened person.)

In many religions, advanced teachers are built up to be much more than they are, and part of that process is the denial of the stature and abilities of those who are seen to be 'lower' than the teachers. It amazes me that whole religious communities are keeping themselves, and being kept, in ignorance of the abundance and power of their own true nature, just so that they can remain in awe and reverence of those who they see as their teachers and leaders.

It is also significant that that particular Buddhist organization makes and sells a wide range of 'sacred geometry' healing devices, which are ALL extremely harmful because of the disruptive and distorting effects they have in our energy systems. ALL sacred geometry has come to us from the astral forces ('the dark side') for the purpose of getting us seriously ungrounded and maximally open and vulnerable to astral entities and their interferences and attacks. You can read about my own experiences with such devices in My Own Self Realization Path.

If you have any such devices, then I counsel that the best thing to do is to summarily destroy them and put the remains in your domestic refuse or wherever they are most likely to be away from prying eyes of people who might get interested in them - except that it would be best to first photograph each device, so that you can later (as soon as possible!) use an Energy Egg (preferably linked to a 'Guardian Angel' or, better, an 'Archangel') and tune it to the particular devices, so that the Egg is then helping you to clear out your accumulated damage from them in your non-physical aspects. More about the Energy Egg, Guardian Angel and truly safe and effective means of self healing and self realization in Healing and Self Realization - The Safest and Quickest Way.

You may also like to make the leader of that Buddhist organization (the Maitreya Monastery) aware of this page and also my page specifically relating to the harmfulness of sacred geometry and crystals... -- Not that such an (almost certain) victim of a partial walk-in would be open-minded at all about the matter!

At the end of a healing session the healer must 'close down' her and the client's chakras for protection.

Myth. 
This is a widely held and quite harmful myth. It doesn't arise in Reiki healing, because it is believed that the Reiki symbols serve some degree of protective function and so Reiki healers do not 'close' chakras, and, as far as I know, the notion of 'closing down' doesn't exist in Eastern traditions. But in other varieties of spiritual healing, including the bog-standard method taught for NFSH accreditation in the U.K., this fallacy is passed on again and again. If you're a healer yourself, you'd do well to stop and think about this one now.

The apparent origin of this myth was in the early spiritualist séance experiments, where the participants naturally 'opened up' at the beginning of a séance and would therefore 'close down' at the end. But at that time they had little understanding of the nature of the chakras that they were supposedly opening up for the sessions. People tended to regard the chakras as though they were closed in normal life and when they were 'open' they were gaping holes through which undesirable energies and influences could enter, so that they had to be closed down again.

I say, that was the apparent origin of the myth because its true origin was from the astral sub-reality ('the dark forces'), who ever so kindly covertly controlled the spiritualists into believing that they needed to close the chakras - in order that the entities could have more hold over those people, as I now explain...

The truth is that chakras are not holes but very busy energy structures and processing centres, and are not closed in normal life (though they can be 'closed' in a relative sense - that is, weak and under-energized). They are processing points for the universal life force energy. Healing energizes the chakras and the person's energy system (aura) overall, thus bringing about many of the positive effects of healing. When chakras are 'opened', they are in fact simply energized, so that they are larger and stronger than before. The more energized they are, the more protected they are from harmful influences.

When anyone 'closes' chakras, even if only partially, what they are doing is de-energizing them again. What is the point of that? The protection has then actually been reduced again, and some of the healing work has straightaway been undone. When positive protection is needed for a chakra, a 'semi-permeable membrane' lid can be placed over it by visualization and intent (though this is largely ineffective in protecting against dark entities). This is most likely to be needed at the solar plexus (third chakra) because that is where many people seek to suck energy from or stick etheric hooks into, and it's where many troublesome entities seek to gain entry.

So, if you are a healer, your wisest course would be to ensure that you and every client finish each healing session with chakras as energized as possible.

It's no use dowsing or otherwise channelling to see if you need to 'close' your chakras after a session, for almost certainly you would be getting dark entity interference, so that any answers that you get would be unreliable. Indeed, dark entities have a strong interest in your keeping your chakras as weak and under-energized as possible, as that facilitates their often covert negative and destructive work upon you - so they will do what they can to convince you that you really do need to 'close' your chakras.

To give a healing you need to draw in the Light.

Myth.
This notion has been disseminated among healers by astral (yes, 'dark'!) entities with the aim of making the healers and recipients of the healings more open and vulnerable to the astral ('dark') forces. Indeed, the notion is only a particular case of the general deception, promoted within people's minds through interference from astral entities, that you need to look outside yourself for the highest and purest source(s) of healing energy, wisdom or protection. The true 'highest' and purest source which we can access is not outside ourselves at all, but within.

And what is that 'highest' healing source? ...Actually, not any 'higher beings', and indeed nothing higher than yourself!! It is simply your own core essence, which is a 'microaspect' of the all-pervading fundamental consciousness which is the Ultimate as far as anyone can tell. So, the whole tradition of 'drawing in the Light' or in any way invoking supposedly external energies or beings has been given to us and encouraged by the 'dark forces', because by doing so we disempower ourselves and facilitate the hold of astral entities upon us, whereas if instead we worked from and with ONLY our core essence, we would have not only the 'highest' and purest healing source but also would be making it progressively more difficult for astral entities and influences to have any hold upon us. Please see Healing From Our Core Essence.

After a hands-on (or hands-off) healing session the recipient needs to drink a lot of water to clear out the released toxins

Myth.
So many people told me that fiction, when I got into healing from 1998 and onwards, and it is also there in many books on healing - but it never made sense to me, and I always quietly disobeyed such instructions which I was given by anyone who'd given me healing. My understanding now (January 2008) is that this thing of supposedly needing to drink all that extra water is yet another astral ('dark side') sourced fiction, though drinking the extra water isn't in itself greatly harmful as long as you don't make any sort of regular practice of it. Apparently the primary reason for our being given that fiction is to convince people that their healing sessions are doing a lot more good for them than they really are.

So-called spiritual healing, in its multitude of versions, including Reiki and Vortex healing, is distinctly more limited in its effectiveness than is generally believed by its practitioners. The astral forces thus seek to encourage people to quite inappropriately try to use these methods as a major or even the only method in any supposed self realization process of theirs - in order to keep people steered away from truly effective self realization and self healing methods which are safe and free from astral involvement. That's what all this is really about.

Sure, some people get adverse effects from healing sessions which they receive from another person - but those are NOT caused by toxins released by the healing process but result from various sorts of attack from the astral entities interfering with them. For one thing, such healing sessions are usually very ungrounding - this aggravated by the common and absolutely barmy notion that the recipient of the healing should keep his eyes closed and even go out-of-body during the session. As a person gets more ungrounded, so they open more readily and spontaneously to the astral sub-reality and thus become sitting ducks for interference from astral entities. Another ungrounding element in the majority of hands-on healing sessions is the use of 'New Age'-type music in the background, to assist the person in getting nicely spaced out - i.e. having their awareness further ungrounded!

It's helpful or even necessary for the recipient of some healings to go out of body during the session.

Not only Myth but DANGER!
Any healer who believes that particular astral-sourced fiction is (presumably unawarely) being an astral ('dark') force helper of a particularly sinister kind. Such healing sessions are one of the major means to get a person to go out of body sufficiently for the astral forces to stage a partial walk-in upon them. For safety, ALL recipients of healing sessions need to keep themselves as grounded and in-body as possible - and it is the responsibility of the healer to stress the importance of this to the recipient!

Sounds just too scary? -- Well, yes, that gives all the more weight to the importance of de-emphasizing so-called spiritual healing and getting on with true self realization using methods which are grounding, self empowering and free from astral connections. Then you'd have no need to involve yourself with so-called spiritual healing except in specific limited instances. For more about the safe and healthy way to proceed, see Healing and Self Realization - The Safest and Quickest Way.

If a person has the gift of healing ability but doesn't use it, it will eventually be taken away from her.

Myth.
This common belief is based on the fallacy that healing ability is a precious gift that is given to some people and not others for a specific purpose in the current lifetime. In fact everyone has some degree of healing ability or connection, whether they use it or not, and those who are commonly identified as 'old souls' (who are actually new souls according to my current understanding) have this most strongly - some more than others. The strength of healing ability or connection depends on qualities of inner openness and depth of awareness which appear to be intrinsic to particular individuals. It is thus not a gift that has been given to us and which could be taken away. It is intrinsic to our true nature as manifestations of the all-pervading fundamental consciousness.

Also, my mind boggles at what sort of Higher Will would take healing ability away from a person because of non-use of it. That would simply ensure that the particular person never opened up as a healer. The very notion suggests a belief derived from crude religion in which the highest will (God, if you like) is a mean, moralistic and rather vengeful presence that punishes people when they aren't overtly grateful to it (or 'Him' if you like) for what they have. That is all astral ('dark force') agenda and best totally discarded.

It is important / essential to have a person's permission before giving healing to that person.

Myth.
It sounds sort of logical, doesn't it! The standard argument goes, that if you give a person healing without having his permission to do so you are violating that person's free choice - and indeed usually the argument goes further and claims that if you do such a thing, even innocently and with the very best of intentions, severe karma will rebound on you and cause you some sort of serious trouble. So, now let's take this notion apart and look at the pieces...

"If you give healing to a person without his permission you are violating (taking away) his free choice."

There is only one type of healing situation in which this could be true, and that is where the healer is being strongly astral / ego led and is using conscious willpower to direct energies to the recipient in an attempt to bring about a specific outcome, even at a specific time. That is NOT beneficial nor responsible healing work, regardless of whether permission is sought or obtained. Giving healing in that mode harms the healer through weakening and distorting his own energy system (health problems ALWAYS result), and, regardless of whether the recipient has given permission, the intended healing is done without real knowledge or awareness of what work really needs doing.

For example, the healer may try to remove a person's cancer - but that would be an extremely unbalanced sort of healing which could well cause further problems for the recipient - for the healer's ordinary mind has no way of knowing what are the underlying causes of the cancer and thus what is really the most important work that needs to be done. The cancer was serving as a warning signal regarding something more fundamental, and the healer may simply have removed or hidden the warning signal - not a healthy situation at all!

Many such healers believe that they get round the latter problem by asking their 'guides', the recipient's supposed 'higher consciousness' or some supposedly higher source whether it is appropriate, or whether they have permission, to give the healing. What such a healer is doing then is asking that question to astral ('dark') entities posing as the supposedly positive and helpful presences - see Better Without Channelling. What that means is that any answer that is received is worthless, and indeed worse than worthless, because it is given with the specific aim of misleading and causing problems (whether or not the healer or recipient are ever directly aware of the problems). So, clearly, asking any such questions is NOT a way to find out whether a particular healing would be appropriate for the particular person at the particular time.

On the other hand, ALL responsible and properly aware healers work in a completely different way. Although nearly all of them are seriously mistaken in invoking and 'drawing in' supposedly external energies and beings, at least they generally get one thing right - that the only effective way to give healing is to allow the healing energies to work through the healer, without the conscious mind seeking to manipulate the energies and try to achieve a specific outcome. The healer's mind remains completely open as to outcome(s) of the healing. So, for example, the healer's intent isn't "I'm now trying to cure Johnny's cancer", but something like "This is for Johnny's cancer situation, and to assist him towards the most beneficial outcome, whatever that may be".

In this latter mode, it is always assumed and intended that what is not for the recipient's best interests at the present time simply will not happen. When healing is given in this healthy, 'open' manner, if for some particular reason it is important that the particular prospective recipient's permission be obtained first and it hasn't been obtained, nothing would happen! Simple as that!

"If you give healing to a person without his permission, or which interferes with his free will in any way, you will generate very serious karma for yourself."

How can you possibly have created significant karma of any kind when you have had a respectful, loving intent and have given or sent healing on the understanding that what is not helpful at the present time simply won't happen?

This myth about serious karma surrounding healing work has been given to healers by - you've surely guessed by now! - the astral ('dark') forces, which are UNIVERSALLY the source of all the notions of and beliefs in severe, retributional karma - a tremendous distortion of what karma really is - see Karma - Cutting Through the Confusion. I myself have had direct experience of the astral forces' deceptions and lies about severe punitive karmas, for I was given various threatening and indeed nightmarish karma scenarios by astral entities posing as higher sources during my severe troubles from astral entities - see Troublesome Astral ('Dark') Entities -- My own experience.

It is also - would you believe it! - the astral forces, the very embodiment of power / control agenda, which are the source of that so-widespread belief that if you give a healing without first obtaining the prospective recipient's permission, you are violating that person's free choice. -- How come that suddenly 'the dark side' has become a champion of protecting free will?

If you know anything important about the astral forces at all, you will know that they are completely agenda driven, and their agenda is to gain control and domination over humans - all humans - and that they are 1,000,000,...% unscrupulous as to how they strive towards that end. Dishonesty and deceit are their middle name and every other name of theirs. Their own displays of hypocrisy make ordinary human hypocrisy look purer than the driven snow. Their predictions and promises start making politicians' promises look almost honest!

What I'm saying here is that in this particular type of situation the astral forces are controlling people into supposedly being champions of free choice in order to prevent them from giving healings which would help clear people of their astral interferences and make those people free - i.e. to restore more of their free choice, not to restrict it in any way. THAT is what it is really all about. If a person actually wants not to receive a healing done in the responsible, 'open' way that I've described above, that is not the person's free choice speaking at all! That is the voice of the addiction and the astral control speaking through the person. That person is a captive. How can you, as a decent, loving, caring sort of person, say, "Oh, this person's captors are telling me to go away, and therefore I won't help her!"?

Now, it's one thing to try and force a person to do something, but when you send a healing which is carried out in the responsible, healthy way, you are not in any way forcing that person to do anything at all. All you are doing is enabling deeper levels of consciousness to start, to some extent, weakening that person's prison bars, so to speak. You are actually doing a little bit towards increasing that person's free will!!!! So, if you're one of the huge number of healers who have held this crazy belief in the need for permission to give a healing even when it's done in a responsible and healthy manner, you now have a little food for thought!

Let's take another example. Somebody's just taken an overdose and tells you "Go away, I don't want help; I want to die now!". Do you meekly go away and 'mind your own business' because it would be violating that person's free will to call for help for the person? That person is not in control of herself anyway at that point, and so although calling for appropriate help would appear superficially to be violating her free will, actually it would be simply giving her a chance to recover her true free will and get clear of whatever has driven her to take the overdose and (on the surface only) want to die. In most if not all cases interference by astral entities would have been the cause of such behaviour, so how can it be said to be the person's free choice to take an overdose and die?

You see a road traffic accident, and people are lying about, at least unconscious, in a poorly state. Do you go away and mind your own business because those people aren't in a state to give you permission to help or get help? Do you think to yourself "Their higher selves [or the Highest Will] have evidently chosen for this to happen so it would be bad karma for me to interfere"?

That may look like some sort of religious fundamentalism (and indeed it comes from exactly the same source - the astral forces), but actually that is exactly the logic of all these healers who hold off from giving liberating healings on the grounds that they haven't (or wouldn't get) permission from the prospective recipient (or indeed from some supposed higher source, which, as I've already indicated, is ALWAYS really astral entities posing as higher sources). So, ALL of us healers who use that sort of logic in order not to give or send healing to anyone, are playing the astral ('dark force') agenda and NOT operating as true healers in any fundamental way.

Now let's take another, quite different but still related example - something which I myself have just started doing and which I expect shortly to be inviting some other suitable people to also start doing - sending entity clearance healings remotely to certain more or less prominent healers / 'lightworkers' / teachers who are being seriously deceived and led astray by astral entities ('the dark side'), and thus who themselves are thus leading countless other people seriously astray - away from true self realization and into the clutches of the astral forces. Am I really supposed to believe that all these people are operating under their own free will and therefore to weaken the hold of controlling entities on any of them would be interfering with or violating their free will?

Their free will is already massively violated and restricted by the astral entities interfering with them, and those controlling entities do their damnedest to control those people into being very resistant against doing anything which would lead to clearance of the entity control which they are receiving. The same astral interferences control everyone else into being powerless and timid at the very notion of sending healing to start clearing the interferences of prominent individuals who, because of their astral interference, are causing horrendous situations and problems worldwide.

There is a very simple answer to all that confusion - just drop the taboo about all this and get out and do it! Do it in love and from the basis of deep awareness. The BIG caveat about that is NOT whether it is right or wrong to send such healings (things are as they are, and nothing is intrinsically right or wrong), but whether sending any such healing is harmonious with the healer's own energy system at that time. For much of the time it wouldn't be, simply because the healer needs to pay proper attention to his / her own self healing and self realization process, and any healings given to other people need to be kept down to a proportion which maintains top priority for the healer's own self realization process.

For example, in my case for the most part I am sending ONE entity clearance healing to a prominent person (and nobody else) per day, and that takes only a few minutes, and on my hiking days (one or two days per week, weather permitting), generally speaking I don't make time to give any such healings at all. But meanwhile I give myself two entity clearance healings per day, specifically for myself, and spend a total of probably a bit over two hours per day in various self realization practices which require time set aside for them. I have established by means of energy testing that this is the best balance for me at the present time, but even then I energy-test on each prospective healing that I am to give to anyone, in order to ensure that it would be strengthening for me to send at that time.

THAT is the way to work - basing your choices on carefully and vigilantly applied energy testing* (NOT channelling nor ordinary dowsing, which all gives answers from astral entities), so that you are doing only what is for the deepest and ultimate good of not only the prospective recipient of a healing, but of yourself and all others involved in any way.

* To start learning more about proper, grounded energy testing, see Healing and Self Realization - The Safest and Quickest Way.

The bottom line is, if anyone comes to me asking if I have permission to send my entity clearance healings (or any other healing) to whoever I'm sending them to, I shall be sorely tempted to ask, "Do you ask your bottom for permission to wipe it?" -- In other words, there are some things which simply just make the deepest sense.

"A person's free will is sacrosanct and mustn't be taken away in any way."

I would gently point out that if you seriously don't want to impinge upon anyone else's free will, there is only one solution - not to exist! -- But even then, if you chose not to exist, you would still be restricting people's free will because they wouldn't then be able to interact with you!

In fact the whole notion that we must avoid restricting another person's free will in any way is palpable nonsense. We are interacting with each other all the time in all sorts of ways which inevitably limit each other's free will (i.e. their range of options at any moment). All we can usefully aim for is the maximum practicable free choice of all involved - very much a dynamic process of balanced give-and-take. The problems come when, through unawareness and astral force interference, we consciously impose free will constraints on others, which are reducing rather than maximizing the free will of all involved. In all such behaviour there is an imbalance between the giving and taking of free will.

"A person shouldn't be helped with any of their issues without their permission because his higher self [or soul]  has chosen those issues for them for their own learning."

It is total rubbish, sourced again from the astral forces. I have already explained how the vast majority of people are being controlled by astral entities into being resistant against themselves being freed from astral interference and control. So it naturally follows that such people will use a distorted version of the notion of free will in order to discourage anyone from freeing them.

Also, this notion of choices made at some higher level for certain experiences to be taken on in order to gain particular learning is another astral sourced fabrication to dissuade people from working to assist others in clearing their astral interferences and control. Indeed I myself took on board and sort-of believed for a while such fiction about my own emotional and entity issues. It was all a ploy to make it as difficult as possible for me to get clear of my entity interferences and become fully self realized.

As manifestations of fundamental consciousness, we have NO life purpose of learning or gaining wisdom in the way that is so widely believed, because within ourselves we already have all the wisdom and knowledge that we'd ever need - it's just a matter of uncovering it. Our most fundamental life purpose is to experience, not specifically to learn (though naturally learning is an important though less fundamental part of the life experience), and to become fully functioning as manifestations of the all-pervading fundamental consciousness. Thus any obstructions to a person's self realization (which also means gaining their totally free state, with maximum free will) are actually 'fair game' for ANY healer to assist in dissolving, even if the recipient of such assistance superficially appears resistant to any such thing happening - because it isn't that person's own free will that would be opposing his becoming freer.

Also, the very notion of the 'higher self' or 'higher consciousness' is bogus, given to us from the astral forces. For 'higher self', read 'interfering astral entities'. Your own deepest or core essence doesn't operate at all like the so-called higher self and is not a separated-off part of yourself 'up there' but is simply the deepest level of your awareness or consciousness.

It appears very likely - at least my 'reading' indicates this to have been the case - that when I was going through tremendously difficult 'dark' times from the astral entities from late 2003 right up to the end of 2006, various people who became aware of my situation (mostly through this website), and could have assisted me in various ways, in fact did not assist because they believed, or at least their 'guidance' (actually astral interference) told them, that it would be wrong to assist me because my higher self had chosen for me to be 'dropped in it' with the 'dark forces', and that it was necessary for my own learning for me to be left to cope unaided.

That misguided outlook was based purely on astral sourced misinformation and had the same logic as leaving a person who's fallen over a cliff to die because "her higher self had chosen for it to happen for the purpose of her own learning, and it was all part of her learning to get herself out of that situation or at least ask for help".

But hold on a moment - you CAN generate karma for yourself by giving a healing...

Yes, any healing which wasn't fully harmonious with your energy for you to give at the particular time would create some (normally tiny) degree of distortion and weakening in your energy system, and that would be a karma in the correct use of the term - but that would be no more of a problem than the countless increments of such distortions or weakenings (i.e. karmas) which, unless you are living with intent*, you would me causing for yourself by all manner of unharmonious choices in your everyday life. I refer you again to Karma - Cutting Through the Confusion for a balanced view on karma.

* By 'living with intent' I mean, living in a mode in which one is aware of or tests for the consequences of any choice or environmental factor upon oneself, and through this means chooses, as far as physically possible, only what is strengthening to one's energy system and thus is what is for one's deepest and ultimate good. A person who is truly living with intent in this way rapidly increases in health and happiness, and is pointing directly to true self realization. As to how to live with intent yourself, there is an easy way to start doing so - energy testing. Living with intent, along with all other true self realization practices, progressively dissolves all existing karmas.

You can ensure that you give only healings which are harmonious to your energy system at the current time by using energy testing (mentioned above). That way, ensuring that you give only appropriate healings is a very simple matter.

Karma is a serious matter that needs special kinds of healing.

Myth.

As just noted above, all you need for dissolving your load of karmas is the process of living with intent and the use of any other true self realization practices. See Karma - Cutting Through the Confusion for a balanced understanding of karma, and Healing and Self Realization - The Safest and Quickest Way for some great ways to dissolve it all.

In fact, special healings for karma are ALL of 'the dark side', and are based on distorted, astral sourced notions of the nature of karma, and typically involve invoking supposed higher beings (e.g. the so-called Lords of Karma) which themselves are simulations given to the healer by the astral forces, thus increasing the astral ('dark') connections of both healer and recipient.

Yes, I myself, back in the early 2000s tried giving myself the odd healing of karma, invoking the so-called Lords of Karma - and a fat lot of good it did me. As I now understand it, not only was that not a method that could dissolve any karmas anyway, but, because using such a method was distorting and weakening for my system it was actually creating a new karma and also still further increasing the hold of the astral forces upon me. Also, all the major karmas which I assumed that I was carrying, from a very large number of past lives of mine - to whatever extent they really existed - were actually not mine at all but were those of the parasitic 'lost' human souls attached to me, of which I knew nothing until 2007.